Portrait of Thomas Nagel

Thomas Nagel

b. 1937 · American philosopher

“What is it like to be a bat?”

Life and education

Born
4 July 1937, Belgrade, Yugoslavia
Education
Cornell (BA 1958); Oxford BPhil (1960); Harvard PhD (1963, under John Rawls)
Positions
UC Berkeley (1963–1966), Princeton (1966–1980), NYU (from 1980); now NYU professor emeritus
Fields
Philosophy of mind, ethics, political philosophy

American philosopher who stands out in both philosophy of mind and ethics in the late 20th century. He did his PhD under John Rawls at Harvard and taught philosophy and law at NYU.

His 1974 paper "What Is It Like to Be a Bat?" argued that consciousness has a character accessible only from a subjective point of view, which objective physical science can't capture. In Mind and Cosmos (2012) he argued that neo-Darwinian materialism can't account for consciousness and reason, stirring up major controversy. He received the Balzan Prize and the Rolf Schock Prize in 2008.

Timeline

  1. 1963PhD, Harvard
  2. 1970The Possibility of Altruism
  3. 1974"What Is It Like to Be a Bat?"
  4. 1979Mortal Questions — moral luck
  5. 1986The View from Nowhere
  6. 2012Mind and Cosmos

Big ideas

What it's like to be a batA being is conscious if there's something it's like to be that being. That subjective character can't be captured by objective description.
The view from nowhereWe try to see the world objectively, but the tension between subjective and objective viewpoints is a fundamental problem of philosophy.
Moral luckWe're morally judged by luck we can't control — which exposes a deep paradox in the idea of responsibility.

If you think like them…

If you're like Nagel, you're sensitive to the gap between "what it feels like from inside" and "what explains it from outside." You respect science but don't think it's everything, and you tend to believe moral truths are discovered.

Free willFree will is realFree will skeptic
Right actionConsequentialismDeontology
What morality isRealismAnti-realism
Mind & bodyPhysicalismDualism
Being youPsychologicalBodily

Rough positions on the five questions the quiz uses. These simplify each philosopher's actual views and are open to interpretation.

Thought experiments featuring them

Key works

Sources