Portrait of Eric Olson

Eric Olson

Contemporary · American-born philosopher at the University of Sheffield

“You are a human animal”

Life and education

Education
BA, Reed College; PhD, Syracuse University
Position
Professor of Philosophy, University of Sheffield, UK
Fields
Personal identity, material objects, time, death
Also
Author of the SEP entries "Personal Identity" and "Animalism"

American-born philosopher teaching at the University of Sheffield in the UK, and the best-known defender of "animalism" in the personal identity debate. He wrote the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's entry on personal identity.

In The Human Animal (1997) he took on the psychological continuity theory that had dominated since Locke, arguing that we are essentially biological human organisms, and that our identity conditions lie in the continuation of life processes, not psychology. His criticisms that psychological theories face the "thinking animal problem" and the "fetus problem" drove a major debate.

Timeline

  1. 1997The Human Animal: Personal Identity without Psychology
  2. 1997"Was I Ever a Fetus?"
  3. 2007What Are We? A Study in Personal Ontology
  4. NowProfessor of Philosophy, University of Sheffield

Big ideas

AnimalismWe are human animals (organisms). You exist as long as your life continues.
The thinking animal problemThere's an animal sitting in your chair, thinking. If you're not that animal, there are two thinkers in the same place.
The fetus problemOn psychological theories, you were never a fetus — a hard conclusion to accept.

If you think like them…

If you're like Eric Olson, you see "you" as this living body more than as memories or personality. Teleportation is just copying, and even if you lost every memory, you'd still be you. You have a realist streak that trusts biological facts over philosophical intuitions.

Free willFree will is realFree will skeptic
Right actionConsequentialismDeontology
What morality isRealismAnti-realism
Mind & bodyPhysicalismDualism
Being youPsychologicalBodily

Rough positions on the five questions the quiz uses. These simplify each philosopher's actual views and are open to interpretation.

Thought experiments featuring them

Key works

Sources